Multiple-winged Machine -The 'Katydid'
The multiple-winged glider, eventually dubbed the 'Katydid' by the experimenters, went through many changes in the two weeks that it was flown at Miller beach. Perhaps the best description of those changes and the flights themselves was written the following year in 'Gliding Experiments' - a lecture by Chanute that was published in the Journal of the Society of Western Engineers. The section concerning the 'Katydid' is here, and complete lecture is on
another page.
The images are presented here as thumbnail images.
Click on the image for a full size image.
- After abandoning this first form of machine [the Lilienthal glider], the experimenters in the sand
dunes next tested the machine built after the fashion of the ladder kite which
had proven so steady in the air.
-
- Fig. 224 exhibits a front view of this arrangement. It consisted of six pairs
of wings, superimposed and trussed together, pivoted at their roots upon a
central frame, the lower chord of which was spread open to receive the man at
the center. Here he was expected only to move for the purpose of steering, the
stability to be maintained by the movements of the wings above him, which
swung on their pivots back and forth, restrained by rubber springs, when the
wind struck one side more than the other, or changed the center of pressure
fore and aft. It will be seen that this is just the reverse of the first
method tested, in which the man moved and the wings remained fixed. This wing
movement took place as expected, but it was very soon found that there was an
essential difference between the support from the wind derived from the same
arrangement when flown as a kite, at an angle of incidence of 30 to 40
degrees,
-
- FIG. 224. First Form
Multiple-Wing Machine.
-
- and when flown as a gliding machine, at an angle with the wind of three or
four degrees, which is the most favorable for reducing the total resistance to
a minimum. It was found that at very acute angles the moving air was deflected
downward by the front wings, so that the support under all the following wings
was greatly diminished, and that the apparatus was inefficient when its
surface was considered. This had been expected, from prior experiments, and
the frame had been designed so that the grouping of the wings could be readily
changed. Then began an interesting and instructive evolution. The grouping of
the wings was gradually changed, through six permutations, each being guided
by gliding flights and by releasing bits of featherdown in front of the
machine, and watching the paths of the air currents which swept past the
wings. The result of this evolution was to change greatly the outward
appearance of the apparatus while retaining the same general principle.
-
- Fig. 225 shows the improved arrangement as seen from one side in flight. It
will be noticed that no less than five of the six pairs of wings have been
superimposed at the front, and trussed together. That the operator is within
and under them, and that a single pair of wings remains at the rear to serve
as a tail. This tail was flexible and vibrated up all down in flight when the
angle of incidence varied in consequence of the back and forth movements of
the pivoted front wings.
-
-
-
- FIG. 225. Sixth Form Multiple-Wing Machine.
- Fig. 226 shows a front view of the same machine in flight. About two hundred
glides were made, in winds of 13 to 22 miles an hour, on a descending course
of about 1 in 4 (14o), the longest flight being 82 feet from a height of
about 20 feet. There was, however, undue friction in the wing pivots, thus
retarding their
automatic action, so that the operator had to move two or three inches, as
against some 15 or 18 inches on the previous machine, and there being some
further defects in the spacing of the wings, both vertically and horizontally,
it was determined to rebuild the machine with the practical information thus
obtained.-
-
FIG. 226. Front View Multiple-Wing Machine in Flight.
-
-
-
-
Camp was accordingly broken up early in July, with the conviction that more
had been learned during this two weeks of experiment with full-sized machines
than had previously been acquired during about seven years of theoretical
study and experiments with models. The equipment was returned to Chicago,
where three machines were constructed, and towards the end of August they were
taken out to the wilderness of sand dunes, north of Dune Park, about five
miles from Miller.
-
-
-
- FIG. 227. Seventh Form Multiple-Wing Machine.
[Ed. note - was also 'Plate 10' in McFarland's publication of the Chanute Diary of these experiments.]
-
- Fig. 227 shows the multiple-wing machine as reconstructed. This consisted of
the same wings and of a new frame, and instead of ordinary pivots, there were
ball bearings at the ends of vertical wooden posts to which the roots of the
wings were attached, the latter being all trussed together, with vertical
posts and diagonal wire ties, this being probably the first application which
has been made of the Pratt truss to flying machine design. The frame was all
made of spruce, the surfaces were of Japanese silk varnished with pyroxelene;
the complete machine weighed 33 1/2 pounds, the supporting surface at the
front was 143 1/2 square feet, including a concave aerocurve over the top,
added when the front wings were cut down to four pairs, and the rear wings or
tail measured 29 1/2 square feet in area. With this arrangement a great many
glides were made, with the result of more than doubling the lengths previously
attained, of reducing the angle of flight to 1 in 5, or 10o to 11o,
and of diminishing the required movements of the operator to one or two inches
in preserving the equilibrium.
-
-
-
- FIG. 228. Multiple-Wing Machine in Flight.-(From a drawing.)
-
- Fig. 228, reproduced from a drawing, shows this apparatus as it appeared in
flight. It might have been preferable to omit the aerocurve over the top, and
to have placed all the supporting surface in the pivoted wings at the front.
This aerocurve was added to save the expense of rebuilding the old wings, and
this saving proved to be a mistake. The wings were so far racked and distorted
by their prior service that they did not support alike and did not balance the
weight properly, and thus the results obtained with that machine were inferior
to those to be hereafter described. Yet the principles deemed to be sound, and
it is believed that the apparatus can be further improved.